The NHS Needs More Money, but it Also Needs a Community Revolution

In 2017, Britain’s National Health Service was beset by a “humanitarian crisis” that saw Red Cross volunteers stepping in at overcrowded accident and emergency units. At the beginning of 2018, we have witnessed a system not just at breaking point but practically snapping at the seams.

Scheduled surgeries have been cancelled en masse due to bed shortages. Hospital corridors have become makeshift wards lined with untreated patients abandoned on trollies and sleeping on floors.

Ambulance staff, forced to monitor patients, are unable to attend other emergencies - contributing to numerous preventable deaths. Even cancer treatment is now subject to rationing.

Labour blames the Conservative government’s underfunding. The Tories retort that NHS spending has been ring-fenced. Since 2010, the annual spending increase has been one percent on average. Britain still lags behind health spending in other major European economies. This is a Conservative crisis.

General practitioners leaving the NHS outstrip the number being trained as morale is so low. Difficulty accessing GPs makes more patients resort to A&E.

33,000 nurses a year are leaving yet bursaries for student nurses have been scrapped. This is unlikely to incentivise potential NHS recruits.

Since the Brexit referendum over 10,000 EU nationals have quit the NHS and recruitment from the EU has collapsed. In an absurd irony, work visas are being denied to medically skilled migrants from outside the EU who could fill vacancies, as the salaries on offer are too low under Home Office regulations.

The NHS has a staffing crisis just as critical as its economic crisis - it has nearly 90,000 staff vacancies, 35,000 of these being nursing posts. Changes to junior doctors’ working rotas led to strikes over safety concerns and frontline staff have suffered years of pay freezes.

So how can we resuscitate an NHS on life support?

an ageing and expanding population means that politicians need to be more ambitious

A general tax increase - or even a dedicated NHS tax - might be controversial, but the outcome would be an NHS capable of providing a high quality service. Labour have pledged to increase NHS spending by £30 billion over five years.

A more ambitious target would be to match the average healthcare spend of the wealthiest EU economies, which would require an extra £40 billion per year - a tall order but achievable if we tackle long-term dilemmas.

The public pay cap is a false economy, costing billions in agency staff costs. Raising pay is vital to ending the staffing crisis.

But an ageing and expanding population means that politicians need to be more ambitious.

The pharmaceutical industry has persistently increased its prices despite taxpayers funding the research developing drugs. The government should be more proactive in reducing costs. Shortening the time of drug patents would allow rivals to develop drugs more cheaply. Transparency laws revealing where companies invest profits would put them under public pressure. Savings could be invested in frontline care.

The smoking bans introduced by Labour reduced smoking-related diseases. In the same vein, a sugar tax and increasing alcohol duties on higher strength products would decrease health problems.

While addiction should be approached with compassion, “drunk tanks” would discourage revellers burdening A&E at weekends.

Nor can we seriously address public health problems without confronting social injustice and vested interests.

The drop in life expectancy in some areas of Britain has been directly attributed to cuts in public services and social security. Poverty and poor quality housing inevitably contribute to mental and physical health issues.

But to effectively improve public health we must also improve the provision of care in general.

Hospitals should be the last resort, not a first resort

Cuts to social care budgets have put an unnecessary strain on hospitals. Elderly patients who cannot be safely discharged, or for whom there is no space in the care system, are quite insensitively known as “bed-blockers”. In many cases, they could be discharged if they had assistance in their own homes.

It is time for radical reform to make the NHS fit for the 21st century. The organisation can regain its former prestige by merging with social care as part of a community revolution in healthcare.

Hospitals should be the last resort, not a first resort. By integrating social care and the NHS, a community service could not only work with patients to prevent health problems but also provide long-term care.

With medicine extending lifespans, more people are suffering from chronic diseases such as dementia and heart conditions. These could be dealt with by community clinics, or even at home, rather than at hospitals.

Patients can manage their illnesses without attending hospital month after month. That does not mean less care. It means better, more personalised care.

Meanwhile, hospitals can focus on acute conditions, intensive care and emergencies. Fewer cancelled operations. Shorter waiting times at A&E. Patients not spending sixteen hours waiting for an ambulance.

After years of failure to provide parity of NHS funding, a community NHS could provide better mental health facilities. At present, A&E is the only recourse for tens of thousands in mental health crisis. Localised treatment has the benefit of being more appropriate for mental health patients, who could use quiet drop-in centres equipped with counsellors and inpatient beds.

Community healthcare would allow the NHS to invest as much in prevention as it does with cures.

The Equality Act obliges public bodies to make equality central to their decision-making. An equivalent Better Health Act could require local authorities and schools - in fact, all public bodies - to promote healthier and active lifestyles, and counteract damaging consumer advertising - such as aggressive alcohol marketing and an emphasis on body image harmful to young people.

In 1948, Labour founded the NHS in a post-war spirit of compassion. But it also took Aneurin Bevan’s political determination for it to become a reality. The policies to save the NHS from decline, and preserve it for future generations, may have to be as revolutionary as its foundation.

More about the author

About the author

Jacob Richardson began his career with Disclaimer and writes on culture, politics and society. Politically he is a democratic socialist and Labour Party supporter. His other interests include cinema, psychoanalysis and professional wrestling.

Follow Jacob on Twitter.

Enjoyed this article?

Help us to fund independent journalism instead of buying:

Also in Disclaimer

Tweet Checking: Why has the Russian Embassy Become an Expert Troll?

Following the government's assessment that Putin's government perpetrated a chemical weapons attack on British soil, people have demanded more evidence, What they mean is they don't like the evidence they have. They are joined by the editor of the Daily Mirror, and the Russian Embassy. Good company for Seumas Milne.

Weekend Poetry: Two Poems

Poetry from Paul Henry

The Red Beach Hut Shapes the Reader into the Perfect Devil’s Advocate

Over the last decade, Linen Press has established a reputation for passion, integrity and excellence and was shortlisted for the Pandora Women in Publishing prize in 2015. Linen Press has a history of innovation and is never afraid to push the boundaries and take a risk to share women’s voices with the world. The Red Beach Hut is a poignant novel centred on the fleeting but powerful friendship between a boy and a man, both haunted by their own demons.

Immoral and Reckless Russia Deserves A Swift and Severe Response

Theresa May's may have been cautious in the Commons as she held back from directly accusing Vladimir Putin's regime of complicity in the nerve gas attack in Salisbury but ther government will be considering options in how to respond. One way or another, change is coming in our relationship to Putin's Russia.

Hail Britannia, Farewell Globe. Will the Next Political Generation Succeed Where the Present are Failing?

The irony of Brexit is that is was a reaction against some of the ills of globalisation but also a hark back to Britain as a global trading nation. Our next generation of political leaders had better have ideas to resolve voters' contradictions or they will fail, as surely as o9ur present crop are.