On Trade, Hypocrisy, And China's Human Rights

A ship moored up at the London Container Terminal at Tilbury this morning, in from Hong Kong.

Her name is the Maersk Lins and she’s pretty big. She’s not as big as these things can get, but still three hundred metres, more than a hundred thousand tonnes. 

Now, do you know what she does?

She carries about 9,000 of those hefty steel boxes you see in endless lines on trucks - Twenty Foot Equivalent Units is their professional title. They hold almost all the stuff we buy these days as it gets transported from China.

No human rights protestors marked the good ship Lins’ arrival. None will hurl themselves between the containers and the lorries as the offloading grinds on for the couple of days it will take.  No one will scream for China’s wrongly imprisoned at the warehouses, or on the goods’ onward journey to the shops.

fundamentally we don’t care about human rights in China. We certainly don’t care enough to let it stand between us and the espresso maker we want at a price we’re prepared to payWe’ll buy them without a thought - probably at about the time one of the Lins’ sisters is nosing her way into Tilbury, again unmet by righteous fury.

Because fundamentally we don’t care about human rights in China. We certainly don’t care enough to let it stand between us and the espresso maker we want at a price we’re prepared to pay.

Now we can argue for as long as we like about whether things should ever have been this way, whether we should ever have done business with a one-party communist state of precisely the kind Orwell raged against. Or whether we should have won our battle for workers’ rights only to sack all our workers and buy instead from places where those rights are a little more than an unreachable dream of paradise. 

But we did. In our defence, others did too. 

Indeed UK trade with China is a laggard compared to that of our major European partners (none of whose’ ambassadors face protests in London from those who care about human rights in China). The US is China’s biggest trading partner.  The pavements outside the US embassy in Grosvenor Square are clear.

This laggard status is precisely why we are gearing up to fawn over Chinese President Xi Jinping as only we can. State banquet at the Palace next week, if you please.

In some respects of course this is all highly embarrassing stuff, even without the huge elephant marked Human Rights in the State Dining Room (perhaps Prince Phillip will shoot it). As the inventors of commercial nuclear power, oh, and railways, it is astonishing that we now need Chinese expertise in both. But again, that’s the way it is.  We may not like it, but no one cares about that.

It’s too late. Decades too late. 

We’re trading with China. We are going to trade more with China. 

Perhaps increased exposure to international norms will one day make a difference to China’s oppressed.  They and we will have to hope so because it’s the only way it’s going to happen.

Now excuse me, I need a new espresso maker.

More about the author

About the author

Born and raised in Swansea West, one of the safest Labour seats in the country, David is perhaps unsurprisingly a High-Tory, Euroskeptic Royalist Libertarian with an unhealthy adoration for Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. As a result he is seldom pleased by anything that ever happens, and always on the verge of quitting the whole jamboree. A former Special Writer at the Wall Street Journal, he knew the crash was coming when he saw a piece about Louis XVI reproduction furniture "for your Winnebago."

Follow David on Twitter.

 

 

 

Enjoyed this article?

Help us to fund independent journalism instead of buying:

Also in Disclaimer

How to Make the Most Important Innovation of the 20th Century Fit For the 21st Century

United Nations does not currently enjoy the best reputation. Founded in 1945 as a way of both preserving and enforcing peace, the United Nations was designed to fix problems where its predecessor the League of Nations failed. peacekeeping. Now it is being characterised in much the same way, seen as toothless, impotent and irrelevant.

Why Brexit can’t transform Commonwealth trade

Among hard Brexiters, re-engaging with the Commonwealth offers one of the more seductive “opportunities of Brexit”. The Commonwealth secretary-general, Patricia Scotland, has pledged to “turbocharge the Commonwealth trade advantage”. But a closer look suggests that Brexit cannot create a new economic role for the Commonwealth.

Empire, the Windrush Generation and the Failure of Liberalism

Many of the Windrush Generation who arrived between 1948 and 1973 never planned to travel outside the UK again. Suddenly, they needed passports to keep their jobs and access vital services such as healthcare. Despite evidence of them having lived here for decades, the Home Office decided not to believe them. How could things go so wrong at the Home Office that it too did not consider them British?

Tweet Checking: Left-Wing "Fake News", Conspiracies Only End Up Helping the Right

bad ideas and notions ultimately hurt the Left and help the Right. Whether it be conspiracies, fake news, factoids, bad rhetoric, or mud-slinging, all it does is feed into right-wing assertions—sometimes unfortunately accurate—of leftist hysteria, intolerance, and untrustworthiness.

IIn America - and the UK - Homelessness Is Becoming a Humanitarian Crisis

The homelessness epidemic faced in developed countries has been described as a humanitarian crisis unfolding in our streets. There’s a direct correlation between the rising cost of living in cities and the severity of homelessness. This crisis has reached a point where it’s drawn comparisons to poverty in developing nations, as homelessness jumps to record-breaking levels in the U.S. and further afield.