Phil has run Clarity Economics, a London-based consultancy, since 2007 and, before that, was Economics Correspondent at The Independent.
Phil won feature writer of the year Work Foundation Work World media awards in 2009, and was commended by the Royal Statistical Society in 2007.
Articles by Phil
While media attention was focused on Boris Johnson's Daily Telegraph essay, Mark Carney, the Bank of England Governor laid out in cold clear detail the likely implications of Brexit. It makes for brutal but mandatory reading in these times when politicians only skim the surface.
A combination of complacency and incompetence has shaken Western politics. Trump and Brexit were both derided. Now they are mainstream. In a volatile political world, it is no longer possible to predict events. So could nuclear disarmament be the next issue that secures an unexpected win?
Brexit is hurting Briton's in their family budgets whether it is the cost of a family holiday or the weekly food shop. Remainers need to start showing how Theresa May's bad Brexit policy is hurting. If the can do that then voters might question whether this was what the voted for.
The electorate did more than just thumb their nose at Theresa May, they have also rejected the idea that policy should be driven by the reaction of financial markets and the cacophonous chorus from the right-wing media. Take all those factors together and it looks rather like a return to grassroots democracy.
The opinion polls may be all over the shop, but one key revelation is that one factor that explains the difference in their forecasts is their estimate of the turnout among the 18-24 age group. The vast majority of that group has been wowed by Jeremy Corbyn. Whether they vote should be a no brainer.
The general election campaign has revealed that Theresa May is bad at choosing allies. She has snubbed Europe in favour of an intemperate bully. After Donald Trump smeared Sadiq Khan following the London terrorist attack, she should cancel his State Visit and invite someone more worthy.
The Tory and Labour manifestos take us back, not to the 1970s but to the 30s and 40s when the great rivals, John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich von Hayek, waged an intellectual battle that echoes to the present day. At its heart, should we borrow, or not, to stimulate economic growth?
As Donald Trump finds himself blocked by the courts, impeded by Congress and criticised by the press for his chaotic approach to government, Theresa May is sailing towards an easy landslide victory at the general election. Despite appearances, one system is working, the other is not.
This week Theresa May will invoke Article 50. Perhaps it is time to look at the causes of Brexit: record employment masks long-term unemployment and unease in areas that have lost industries and jobs. We need an agenda that can hail the benefits of globalisation and invests to make them available for all.
Breaking a manifesto commitment Philip Hammond decided to use his Budget to attack the growing number of self-employed people with a hefty tax bill. Jeremy Corbyn did not mention it in his response. It seems the only effective opposition is the media.
Nationalism is threatening the European consensus of openness and inclusiveness. Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen build support but so do centre-left Martin Schulz and Emmanuel Macron. Distrust of establishments grows, but the populism of Donald Trump is not the only way to win.
As May flies into the United States this weekend to become the first leader to meet Trump, people on this side of the Pond will get a good idea of what the Special Relationship will mean for our small island once it’s cast adrift from the European continent.
Following strong post-referendum growth, the economics profession has a clear opportunity to make two vital points. The first is to echo that mea culpa and say that it was wrong to be so definite, but insist that by using billions of data points from the past it can make a pretty good estimate about the future.
Donald Trump just a pantomime villain with an arsenal of vile epithets and put-downs but saying that his election is the end of the world is simply diverting attention away from the failures of the current political, business and wealth-owning elites across the developed world that have allowed people like him to win power.
Rachel Lichtenstein's Estuary is a gentle celebration of histories and communities rather than a socio-economic tract or a historical whodunit. But maybe just as she helped pioneer the current obsession with Brick Lane, Estuary may do the same for this vast yet largely ignored stretch of water.
After five years of austerity the idea of borrowing to invest is only beginning to emerge in the global economic and political debate. Christine Lagarde has been putting the case for more government spending. We will have a modest fiscal stimulus in many countries but not with international coordination or with any IMF advice.
A higher minimum wage; billions of borrowing to fund infrastructure; opposition to the transatlantic trade deal; initiatives to ease the plight of those left behind by globalisation. McDonnell seems halfway there with a string of initiatives aimed at reaching out to voters.
Whenever they are given the opportunity, voters reject more Europe. Yet on every occasion policy remained unchanged. The euro may not have failed but Joseph Stiglitz's new book is a devastating indictment of the way that the Eurocracy established the European single currency.
Amid an incredibly febrile world, eyes are again turning to the perennially stable United States. But the image that greets them now is not calm but powerful Uncle Sam but a simmering pot of tensions. If a solution does not come from Clinton or Trump then one can only hope there is a new potential unifier waiting in the wings.
A fast-moving mix of Whose Line is It Anyway, Monty Python and Fawlty Towers mixed with a fair dose of Burlesque, Shit-faced Shakespeare is a quintessentially British take on the country’s most celebrated playwright whose 400th birthday happens to fall this year.
David Cameron has fallen on his sword, Boris Johnson has abandoned his prime ministerial ambition, while Jeremy Corbyn is hanging on to the Labour leadership by his finger nails. The one person to emerge with honour intact is Mark Carney, the Canadian who has run the Bank of England for the last three years.
There may not be much rejoicing yet, but the repentance by the International Monetary Fund over its devotion to policies of neoliberal austerity policies will certain leave many of its critics with a wry smile.
Since it first emerged almost six years ago that Greek politicians had committed financial jiggery-pokery that had left their proud country on the brink of default, the response of the rest of Europe has been clear: the Greeks must pay for the consequences through austerity.
The price of oil has risen from around $32 a barrel in mid-February to almost $50 a barrel by mid-May. On 16 May alone while Boris Johnson was banging on about Hitler and George Osborne was courting in Ryanair, Brent crude jumped 2.5% in one day alone. The worry is that oil prices are on the brink of a delayed surge in prices.
The new London mayor has major goals on affordable housing, transport and business - none of which is likely to be solved within 100 weeks let alone 100 days. But it is essential that voters see some details on his manifesto pledges and the first steps being taken towards achieving them.
It is a good sign that a political issue has achieved “meme” status when it becomes the subject of a film. Finally poverty and particularly the gaping inequality between the richest and poorest in western societies are - not before time - getting their place on the red carpet.
The decision by the Mumbai board not to shut Tata Steel means the steel plants in Port Talbot in South Wales as well as sites across the Midlands and the North will stay open. But if no buyers are found the impact will clearly be devastating on industrial regions of the country that have taken a series of hits since deindustrialisation took hold in the early 1980s.
People protesting against the Housing Bill have launched their own perfect imitation of London’s Evening Standard newspaper to get the message of their opposition out to the electorate. It could be a sign that the official opposition to the Conservative administration is asleep on the job or it could simply the inevitable result of innovation in social media.
After the 2008 crash, disciples of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman urged governments to embark on austerity to prevent economies going bankrupt. Yet the Keynesians may just be about to move back into the ascendancy.
Earnest predictions of the death of the book, the death of television, the death of the cinema and the death of the theatre have all proved to be wide of the mark. Despite The Independent's digital-only relaunch, a thirst for quality news will keep the print media alive.
These last weeks have been a strange time to be British. There has been an intense public debate and media focus, not on the actions of our leaders but on the reputation of some of its more individual citizens.
Anyone expecting a happy new year after 2015 saw economic growth slow as commodity prices and emerging economies crashed while terrorist outrages and a refugee crisis sapped morale will have been disappointed.
The US Federal Reserve effectively raised the cost of borrowing money for the first time in almost a decade. American businesses and households should be able to cope. But it is the impact on other countries that has seen the most intense debate.
The COP21 agreement is not perfect and won't guarantee a cap on the rise in temperature of 2 °C or less. But the summit has sent a clear signal that the world are treating climate change seriously.
The scientific jury has come back: 97% or more of active climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends are very likely due to human activities. The issue in Paris is what action politicians can agree to take.
Forget the general election manifesto, today’s Autumn Statement that covers the four years from April 2016 almost precisely up to the next election is the government’s real statement of intent. Many public services are going to be savaged.
The reality is Daesh has the economy clearly in its crosshairs but the past suggests that homo economicus is resilient.
London is falling behind on the number of homes that need to be built each year to cater for its expanding family and strong demand by businesses for workers.
Ultimately it is governments that can change the distribution of wealth and income through the policies they implement. This above all else may be the biggest impact of Jeremy Corbyn’s elevation as Labour leader is that he has put the role of the state back at the heart of the debate. No longer will both parties agree the market knows best and that we should only tinker with it a greater or lesser extent.
Jeremy Corbyn has an overwhelming mandate from his party to ask the questions that many of his parliamentary colleagues have so far been too timid to ask.
What will Labour’s economic agenda be on the morning of 13 September? As if to prove the old saying about economists’ ability to have two opposing views on any issue, so far one bunch has come out in favour of his plans and another strongly against.
But if there is one thing we have learned since the onset of the global financial crisis is that August can be the cruellest month.
I am self-employed and this is how many of us work these days. And while I am neither looking for sympathy nor hoping for a medal it is worth highlighting that, even in sickness, we freelancers have to keep going when the work is there. It is now becoming a social and economic issue given the dramatic rise in the number of freelancers in recent years.
I first got an inkling that the Conservatives might scrape back into Downing Street a couple of years ago, over lunch during a trip to the US.
We all know the drill on the United Kingdom’s membership of the European Union. If David Cameron manages to scrape home a second term as prime minister, he will start a two-year negotiation to get better terms for the UK.
The UK has an overdraft which is running at almost £98 billion. That’s because there is more money leaving our shores and then there is flowing into Britain. Economists refer to this as the current account deficit.
If there was ever a clear case for government intervention where a market failure is taking place it’s here. And no, it’s not the George Osborne-style interventions to help people buy an over-priced homes. All that does is push prices higher.
In the first series of the blockbuster American TV show The Wire, the anti-heroes Avon Barksdale and Stringer Bell employ murder, serious violence and threats to stay one step ahead of the police and rake in profits from drug dealing. The stakes are high: capture means a heavy jail term but success translates into a small fortune. Given the options, the pair carry on in the face of any setback with the catchphrase: “The game is the game.”
Before the rise of the motorcar roads were shared between all users – walkers, carts, horses, buses, bicycles as well as the occasional car. The car was the odd one out. This demotion of the car to being just another road user is the secret of cities such as Helsinki, Amsterdam and Rotterdam just as much as the money spent on infrastructure. It’s time London did the same.
Squatting in Spain has become a reality, not just for those pursuing some youthful ideal or subversive lifestyle, but for people like Maria, married couples, and families, with no other recourse.
We've known for a long time that enough houses aren't being built in the UK and that this is the main reason why house prices are so out of step with what most people earn.